There have been plenty of reports and rumors over the years
that the Studio Backlot Tour will be closing for the construction of a new area
for Disney’s Hollywood Studios. Everything from lands dedicated to Star Wars or
Cars, to the broader Pixar library, have been on the docket to reclaim the behemoth
swathe of land that is Catastrophe Canyon and Lights, Motors, Action! Extreme
Stunt Show. Exploring the main rationale for why these two attractions should
be closed and why, and how, they could positively affect the park is precisely
what we have of the call sheet for today.
The recurring argument for the demolition of the tour and
the stunt show is that in these days of Blu-ray bonus features where any and
all of the work that takes place behind the scenes on feature films, is there
really a need to rehash those same types of lessons? Action movie bonus
features show off how they launch cars with hydraulics and ramps. Science
fiction features rotate between green screens, rough animation, and
full-fledged computer renderings. Explosions, wire work, stunt doubles, set
construction, even weather effects, everything can be gleamed from a fifteen
minute behind-the-scenes segment on anyone’s favorite movies.
The same types of effects are explored via the stunt shows
and backlot areas of Disney’s Hollywood Studios. Is there a correlation between
seeing the information passed on in person as opposed to on a home theater? The
belief of those who think the time has come to shutter these attractions is
that there is no measureable difference between the two methods of how the
information is distributed to guests and film viewers. The question is, are
they right?
Personally, I think there is something to be said for
actually experiencing the effects firsthand. In looking at Catastrophe Canyon, the
gimbals on the bridge really toss guests about in their rows, rather than just
watch an earthquake set crack a set in two and guests feel the heat of the fire
and get sprayed with the water. Then you get an idea of how the fire lines are
run and how the water is collected and released as you go around behind the set
pieces. In my opinion, guests understand, or want to understand more, because
they themselves have just experienced the effects themselves rather than watch
them happen.
As for the stunt shows, in particular Lights, Motors,
Action!, guests are again watching the action happen but not necessarily taking
part in the events themselves. As I said above, experiencing something
firsthand is key to being invested in finding out more about how and why
something happens. The stunt shows still only offer static viewing, and with
that being their primary means of exposing guests to special effects concepts,
and aside from feeling the concussion of explosions here and there, there isn’t
a big difference between watching the stunt show inside the park or watching a
featurette on a television screen.
Don’t mistake what I am saying here, I’m not trying to take
away from what the stunt personnel do each and every day in the parks. It is
dangerous work that requires a critical understanding of all the pieces in play
and perfect timing, but it is not as engaging to the guests as putting them
into the scene. Similarly, the main problem I still have with Catastrophe
Canyon is that we have all experienced the same earthquake and flood time and
time again. So, without demolishing everything and build an entirely different
land that no longer exposes guests to the behind the scenes world of
moviemaking, how do these areas becoming reinvigorated?
Isn’t it obvious by now? Make it more personal to guests.
During the early days of the tour, when there was a walking portion, younger
guests could fly on a blue screen bumblebee, reenacting a scene from Honey, I
Shrunk the Kids. You don’t have to let everyone participate in order to make it
personal, but if you put a guest on a wire in a carefully constructed set and
pull them away from an ‘exploding’ wall, and people will stand up and want to
know how it works. For larger effects, build a massive exterior set, but unlike
Catastrophe Canyon don’t show off all of your effects in single scene. Rather,
have multiple scenes that can mix and match effects, this way guests are
continually seeing, experiencing, and learning about different effects.
Is any of this cheap or easy? Absolutely not, but it would
be Walt Disney World or Imagineering if it were easy, and likely it wouldn’t be
worth doing either. The backlot and the behind the lens effects are crucial to
the success of Hollywood, and likewise are a fundamental part of Disney’s
Hollywood Studios. They should always have a place in the park, but just as
filmmaking and special effects have adapted over the years, so too must the
park’s backlot.